When working with multiple long sequences it would be nice to bookmark locations making it easy to find where you were previously working. The bookmark could be line highlighting or an icon on the left gutter. Bookmarks would be saved with sequence. Multiple colors or icon would be available.
Exactly as in the subject.
Sometimes the names variables are long and could be deeply nested into containers.
Now it is difficult to use them as both windows: the main one and Selected are unresizable.
After proposed change the property loader would have all default features(behaviours) as you can expect from the window at this place.
Current situation presented on the picrure below.
Hello all TestStand users,
How often i had to debug my sequences ... to find out after many minutes that some of my steps are Skipped !
It would be nice to highlight the skipped steps by default ... (Without having to customize something in TestStand)
Thanks for your help ...
It would be helpful to be able to change the font colors that are displayed for steps in the sequence editor. This would allow users to identify steps quicker for more efficient editing and debugging.
It would be nice to be able to create a new sequence from highlighting steps in a sequence and performing a right mouse click, "Create New Sequence...", this would be a kin to Create SubVI in LabVIEW.
This action could display a dialog to give possible options such as, to copy the Setup and/or Cleanup group, Create in a New SequenceFile or in Current SequenceFile, the option to Move or Copy highlighted Steps. It could also include creating any locals and /or FileGlobals (if creating in a new SequenceFile) used by those highlight steps.
Expose the sequence file version number to be visible in the file properties. (select file in windows explorer -> right click -> properties -> details).
When for example we do right click -> properties -> details tab on .dll assembly we see:
When we do the same on the .seq file we see:
Exposing sequence file version number can simplyfy checking version file number. Now to chek it we have to open sequence file in editor.
I LOVE the autocomplete feature within any of the formula windows. Start typing Locals.F, and it allows you to autocomplete to Locals.Foo.
However, if you have Locals.Foo1, Locals.Foo2, Locals.Foo3, etc, you need to keep typing until you get enough to uniquely match the one you want, or start using the arrow keys in the list (or select with a mouse).
The problem is that if you just type Locals.F, the list of items that shows up is the entire list of Locals.*, in the order they are in Locals.* In reality, once I've typed Locals.F, I should only get the locals variables that start with F, so I don't need to down arrow through all the other Locals.Bar1, Locals.Bar2 that are inbetween Locals.Foo1 and Locals.Foo2 (because for some weird reason I really want the order of my locals variables to be Foo1, Bar1, Bar2, Foo2, Foo3).
So, let's restrict the autocomplete function to only show the items that match what I have already typed, or at least regroup the matching variables at the top of the list so they are easier to select from.
Even better would be to have it context aware. If the formula I am typing is "Locals.MyNumber = 3.1415 * Locals.F", and Locals.Foo1 is a string, Locals.Foo2 is an array of booleans, and Locals.Foo3 is a number, then it should skip over Locals.Foo1 and Foo2 because the context requires a number. Foo1, Foo2, Foo3 should all be in the list of items to choose from if I want to arrow up or down in the list (or use a mouse to select), but Foo3 should be the "defaulted" item that is used if I just hit enter after Locals.F.
How many of you would benefit from the addition of a feature similar to LabVIEW's Quick Drop?
The functionality that initially comes to mind would be typing to search for your desired step type or step template and dropping it into the sequence you are developing. Please add comments for any additional functionality you might like to see in a TestStand step Quick Drop (for example, you may want TestStand to automatically navigate to the Step Properties of a step after it is dropped from Quick Drop).
Please also add comments for any other situations/scenarios (outside of adding steps to a sequence) where you might benefit from a Quick Drop-like functionality. Thank you.
I think this Thread should be placed here.
The aim of this is that users can create the same powerful steps like that once which comes from NI.
Biggest enhancement of this would be that i can get rid of the "edit" - button and there is no floating panel
The second enhancement is that i may use drag and drop between the edit and variable panel (if this is neccessary).
Like Manooch_H I am interrested in comments, too
It would be nice to beable to define a variable as constant.This could apply to Locals, FileGlobals, StationGlobals.
Once set mark it so as to be easily identifible as a Const.
The API would also need to include either a Property or Method so that one could determine if a variable is a Constant.
The menu to create a new variable (right click on variable in an expression edit control and select Create "VariableName") contains all the data types you can use for the variable, however, in the LabVIEW Panel (and other similar panels or dialogs) there is enough context information about the variable to suggest a data type, for example, if the variable is in a control of type Double we know we should create a Numeric variable. TestStand should add the contextual suggestions to the top of the context menu and bold them so that I can more quickly select the data type I want most of the times, then have a separator and put the normal menu so if I don't want that data type for some reason I can still choose the other data types (see attached image).
During development of sequences I often do "trivial" changes in order to check parts of the sequence that I do not want to save afterwards (e.g set Run Modes of steps to Skip). It would be very helpful to see the last changes that can be undone before clicking the Undo-Button arrow (the same applies for the Redo Button of course). This feature would have two major advantages, since one could...
This is implemeted in Microsoft Office programs for example (see screenshot from MS Excel) and I use it there pretty often.
When you set the Post Action On Pass | On Fail in a step to use Call sequence, the only ways to pass data to this sequence is either use some sort of Global (StationGlobals / FileGlobals) or use Locals with the setting "Propagate to SubSequence".
There should be a cleaner way and that is to beable to pass parameters as you do with SequenceCall step type.
The MOST annoying part of working with TestStand is the fact that the developer has to re-enter e-v-e-r-y bloody value for a given parameter when the prototype changes in a LabVIEW VI.
As a sister idea to this one, what is more annoying is the fact that when the container exists for a previous step and is already populated with all the values that you want to repeat elsewhere, TestStand does not allow you to copy and replace a parameter! Unless there a non-obvious way of doing this (I will attempt a few unorthodox ways to get this done). If so, it should be an obvious method and not something that requires contortions to accomplish a simple copy & paste.
Even if the copy & paste could be done from within the parameters, ie: ability to select multiple values and paste them all into the parameter. This is such a basic feature is most or all programming languages and applications that I cannot believe it does not exist in TestStand.
In this particular case, the values are from Locals. variables. And there are lots of them; between two parameters, over 300!!
Let's get on with the times!! Improve the copy & paste feature, even for an ultra basic request like the one Ray Farmer requested in 2011.. See this link:
I have a sequence file that contains hundreds of sequences. It would be nice to be able to logically group and organize these sequences, such as in a tree control with virtual directories (hierarchy), instead of them being in a single long list.
Some test sequencing tools incorporate the idea of configuration based variant handling, where you could define different test variants (e.g. testing at ambient temperature, hot, cold), each variant having it's own set of test limits.
Individual test steps can then be assigned to the previously defined variants. By chossing the desired test variant, the according steps will be executed without having the need to implement additional logic within the sequence.
Like described in this article I have to build Custom Data Types manually to pass enum strings to TestStand.
It would be very nice if I could import LabVIEW Enum TypeDefs into Teststand as Custom Data Types. This way I could save a lot of time.
The TestStand R&D team is committed to reviewing every idea submitted via the TestStand Idea Exchange. However, we cannot guarantee the implementation of any TestStand Idea Exchange submission until further documented.