From Friday, April 19th (11:00 PM CDT) through Saturday, April 20th (2:00 PM CDT), 2024, ni.com will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.

We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.

BreakPoint

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Idea Exchange: Post your lonely orphans

Not my orphan, but a feature that hits home...

 

http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/Native-SSH-and-SFTP-Support/idc-p/1519436#M11536

 

VOTE, VOTE, VOTE!!

0 Kudos
Message 41 of 107
(7,198 Views)

This old Idea, that I found buried deep, regarding First-Run case in the Event Structure seems way cool to me. Also seems like minimal work for NI to implement.

 

Richard






0 Kudos
Message 42 of 107
(7,156 Views)
0 Kudos
Message 43 of 107
(7,122 Views)

There still doesn't seem to be much support for subscript and superscript. Something this basic shouldn't be overlooked in a piece of software which is marketed at the scientific and engineering disciplines.

_____________________________
- Cheers, Ed
0 Kudos
Message 44 of 107
(7,090 Views)

I fell prey to the wall of text and a lack of pretty pictures. Smiley Sad I still think we need better access scope glyphs, though.

 

http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/Better-Indication-of-Access-Scope/idi-p/1506336

David Staab, CLA
Staff Systems Engineer
National Instruments
Message 45 of 107
(7,047 Views)

Stuck at 18 Label position options

@ 23 anti-discrimiation for wire labels

@ a lowly 15 VI documentation editor am I the only one that uses VI documentation?

and with 3 fixing the combo box item editor to support the properties of the combo box type  Actually this may be a bug ?


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
0 Kudos
Message 46 of 107
(7,044 Views)

@Jeff Bohrer wrote:

Stuck at 18 Label position options


Maybe because it's so similar to THIS Idea? Smiley Happy

Richard






0 Kudos
Message 47 of 107
(7,034 Views)

@broken Arrow wrote:

@Jeff Bohrer wrote:

Stuck at 18 Label position options


Maybe because it's so similar to THIS Idea? Smiley Happy


Gee, great minds think alike!


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
0 Kudos
Message 48 of 107
(7,028 Views)

Neither of these are my own, but anyway:

 

The fact that annotations have so many things you cannot do with them programmatically should be a worry for more than 14 people:

 

http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/Add-Line-Width-and-Line-Style-to-Cursor-List-Property/...

 

That X-Controls are not possible to just drop in the user.lib seems to only bother 11 of us...:

 

http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/Index-Xcontrols-inside-user-lib/idi-p/1043923

 

 

 

0 Kudos
Message 49 of 107
(6,957 Views)

LabVIEW makes graphs very simple, unless the data set is very large. It would be more in the spirit of LabVIEW to smoothly support such data sets as well:

 

http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/Decimation-feature-built-into-the-graph-indicators/idi...

 

 

0 Kudos
Message 50 of 107
(6,919 Views)