Pass Fail test MemberType

[Romuald123]

Hello,

If I modify programmatically a pass fail test, I used Step.AsPropertyObject.SetValNumber(“TS.SData.Call.MemberType”, 0, -1), the step is modified with a number: (2147483647),  expected value :  “Do Not Call”

If I try with other argument: 1 (Call Method), 2 (Get Property), 3 (Set Property) it’s works well.

Someone have a solution to my problem?

I used TestStand 4.0

By advance thank you for your help

Romuald.

[Mathieu_R.]

Hello,

I don't know exactly what you are expecting to do programmatically, but you should use the ActiveXModule class. Try somthing like this :

Step.AsPropertyObject.AsStep.Module.AsActiveXModule.MemberType = 1   // or an other valid value

Best regards,

[Romuald123]

First, thank you for your answer.

I add programmatically in a new sequence, a passfail test step, and I change programmatically the step’s properties

NewStep.AsPropertyObject.SetValNumber(“TS.Data.call.ObjectVariable”, 0, “RunState.Engine”)

NewStep.AsPropertyObject.SetValNumber(“TS.SData.Call.InterfaceName”, 0, “Step”)

NewStep.AsPropertyObject.SetValNumber(“DataSource”, 0, “My true/false test”)

The step in the new sequence is well modify, but with the following one, it doesn’t work:

NewStep.AsPropertyObject.SetValNumber(“TS.SData.Call.MemberType”, 0, -1)

I want to configure the new step with “Do not call”, this step works well if I used argument 1 (Call Method), 2 (Get Property), 3 (Set Property), but don’t want to get or set a property, I just want to run the step and have a pass fail test in the new sequence.

I hope my explanations are clear.

Best regards

Romuald

[Mathieu_R. · Accepted solution]

Okay, this could be a solution (tested with TestStand 4.2.1) :

NewStep.AsPropertyObject.SetValBoolean("TS.SData.Call.MakeCall", False, 0x0)

Let me know if it's ok for you...

[Romuald123]

It's ok for me thank you very much, very helpful 🙂

 Best regards

Romuald