NI TestStand Idea Exchange

About NI TestStand Idea Exchange

Do you have a feature idea for how to improve NI TestStand? Submit and vote on ideas now!

  1. Browse by label or search in the TestStand Idea Exchange to see if your idea has previously been submitted. If your idea exists sure to vote for the idea by giving it kudos to indicate your approval!
  2. If your idea has not been submitted click Post New Idea to submit a product idea. Be sure to submit a separate post for each idea. Note: the TestStand Idea Exchange is not the appropriate forum to submit technical support questions.
  3. Watch as the community gives your idea kudos and adds their input.
  4. As NI R&D considers the idea, they will change the idea status.
  5. Give kudos to other ideas that you would like to see implemented!

The TestStand R&D team is committed to reviewing every idea submitted via the TestStand Idea Exchange. However, we cannot guarantee the implementation of any TestStand Idea Exchange submission until further documented.

Top Kudoed Authors
User Kudos Count
1
1
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Visual settings in the steps pane instead of a (sometimes) mile-long text list

The settings field can easily become too long to see every active option and there's not necesarily any consistency between steps if they have differing options. What I mean by that is if you only set the "Do Not Record Result" (my favorite) option in one step, it will be on the left of the settings field. But if you now set several options on another step, the settings are not lined up so that it becomes hard to see at a quick glance which steps I forgot to not record (because TS still doesn't default to not recording steps). You have to analyze the settings line for each step.

Current settings.PNG

 

I propose something more graphical and ordered. Here's my idea of at least ordered. The text could be replaced with icons representing each setting.

Ordered settings.PNG

 

Then it would be graphical, ordered, and concise. What more can you ask for?

5 Comments
Active Participant warren_scott
Active Participant

I like it.

even more if we can add/remove columns from that view (maybe I never want to see the column for precondition or do not record results).

even more if I can hover over the "x" in post expression and get a popup tip-strip with all the information.

Member LoquitoPollo
Member

I guess I should've explicitly mentioned the tip strip, but I figured it could stay the same way. Or...perhaps users would find it more useful to just display the details for the one item they hover over...?

Active Participant warren_scott
Active Participant

Another thing to consider is to make sure we have an accurate view of what the step settings are and whether they have been overridden (such as setting a step load options but the load options are overridden by the sequence file load options, or step results recording options being overridden by sequence record results options)

Active Participant warren_scott
Active Participant

Even better would be if I could customize the columns myself. 

I can choose (for each column) the

   title = "PreExpression"

   Value = len(Step.TS.PreExpr) >0? "X" : " "

   HoverOver = Step.TS.PreExpr

 

This way I can create columns with my custom step variable information in them.

 

To some extent it would be nice to have this configurable per sequence in each sequence file (since different sequences generally have different steps that have different custom step variables), but that definitely becomes confusing especially with respect to where to store that configuration information.  I could see a "out of the box" set of columns and a "user configurable" set of columns.

Member SmokeMonster
Member

Adding to this feature, in addition to displaying the information of the given setting, clicking on the "X" (or whatever it becomes) should take me directly to the menu of the step I click the X on.  So I can hover over the preexpression and if I see it is wrong or want to change it a single click takes me right to it rather than 3-4 clicks to get to the preexpression box.