> Looking at the raw binary isnt really going to decipher much about the
> dll. Even though it looks differenbt, your dll should still be
> organized in the same way. To have a better understanding of this, you
> should use utilities like the
PE
> Explorer that break this down for you.
I was curious as to why the offset of the raw string literals was almost 2k
different between the two builds and why CDB file size was almost 2k
different. Is such differences from the same source possible?
> The cdb file is used only by the debugger, and should not affect the
> behavior of your dll.
Pure hypothetical: can incorrect or corrupted CDB information possibly cause
the CVI debugger to incorrectly flag errors in executing De
bug build code?
The reason I ask is because of the difference in CDB file size for version
that works and version that does not.
> As Elain had mentioned, if you do have some code we can use to try to
> reproduce the problem, that would help also
I will send it if and when I can reduce the problem and I can reliably
reproduce the problem.
Thanks.
---
Joe