04-25-2005 01:26 PM
04-25-2005 01:42 PM
04-25-2005 02:22 PM
04-25-2005 03:49 PM
04-25-2005 03:57 PM
Not sure that it is really a better solution, since it uses twice the memory amount used with the FOR loop method. But it should be more rapid.
johnsold wrote:...I had not thought of the direct approach.
04-26-2005 08:33 AM
04-26-2005 08:51 AM