LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Standard Procedure for selection of required "Additional Installers"?

Hey folks,

 

I did a quick search and didn't see much of this subject regarding additional installer selection, most of the results seemed to be error related...

 

To make it short and simple my question is what is the standard procedure you guys use for selected only the minimum required additional installer when building an installer for your to-be-deployed executable?

 

I understand this is actually in development to be automated based on this idea:

 

http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/Detect-runtime-installers-needed-for-installed-compone...

 

Looking forward to see what they come up with!

 

but in the mean time- what do you guys do?

Kudos to anyone and their suggestions

Thanks!

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 2
(1,999 Views)

Hi PatLyons,

 

This issue is something R&D is aware of and may include in future releases of App Builder. You can be kept up-to-date via the Readmes included with each App Builder release.

 

In the mean time, I suggest including the whole installer for any additional installers that are necessary for your deployment. I understand this can be a painful process, but is necessary at this point.

 

 

Regards,

David B.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 2
(1,964 Views)