01-24-2007 04:00 PM - edited 01-24-2007 04:00 PM
Message Edited by altenbach on 01-24-2007 02:01 PM
01-24-2007 04:18 PM
Hmmm, on my system the comparison is yours: 4.1s, mine: 1.9s. What kind of system are you on? The speed of my code is strongly dependant on the blocksize, which needs to be tailored to fit your system's processor (cache size). I'm also using Labview 8.2. Maybe the compiler got smarter about how it allocates/handles arrays between versions...
thanks for the feedback,
- ben.
01-24-2007 04:44 PM
08-12-2008 08:38 PM
08-13-2008 12:20 AM
bluebeard wrote:
Hi, I must lost zero but to not carry out successful.. 😕
08-13-2008 09:27 AM