From Friday, April 19th (11:00 PM CDT) through Saturday, April 20th (2:00 PM CDT), 2024, ni.com will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.
We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.
From Friday, April 19th (11:00 PM CDT) through Saturday, April 20th (2:00 PM CDT), 2024, ni.com will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.
We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.
03-19-2014 03:18 PM
I got the NI Updater notification that there was a handful of new updates a few days ago, and installed them- one of which was a LabVIEW FPGA patch of some kind. After opening my FPGA code, I got the asterisk notifying that my code was changed (which it wasn't, but I think the update triggered some flag). Before the update, my code would compile in roughly 35-45 minutes. Today I'm sitting at just over 2 hours, and it's still stuck on "Placing and routing". I'm using "Minimum compilation time" as my design strategy, too.
Anyone else seeing this issue?
03-19-2014 03:36 PM
Can you give some more information? What version of LabVIEW? and What version of FPGA toolkit is installed now? The latest release was for 2013 SP1 which came out a few weeks ago so that could be what you are talking about but I usually ignore updates for so long I just wanted to make sure this is what you are talking about.
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
Get going with G! - LabVIEW Wiki.
16 Part Blog on Automotive CAN bus. - Hooovahh - LabVIEW Overlord
03-19-2014 03:51 PM
Is it possible this is the same issue reported by users in this thread?
03-19-2014 04:03 PM
I'm running 2013 SP1, FPGA 13.0.1. I only recently installed the update, as I too don't look at the update notification very often. I was getting a few minor errors here and there and was hoping for a few bugfixes, but honestly I couldn't find the changelogs... so whatever. Does that help answer your question?
Also, my previous compilation attempt just finished at about 2.5 hours, unsuccessfully. I missed a few timing targets by a few nanoseconds- most of which were "non-diagram components". Again, this code has compiled just fine many times in the past, so who knows what's going on here!
03-20-2014 01:31 AM
If you are using a CLIP then any part of that which is not actively being used will be discarded during compilation. Even a single node of a CLIP can lead to huge changes in compilation results depending on how the CLIP is programmed.
So has your code changed AT ALL since you could successfully compile?