LabVIEW

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Interesting Problem on a Graph

Sorry GerdW, I didn't get why did you include 8000 in the index sub array functions? What did you mean with that?

Add 273 on whatever Celcius said.
-Kelvin
0 Kudos
Message 11 of 16
(795 Views)

Hi N.,

 

I didn't get why did you include 8000 in the index sub array functions? What did you mean with that?

"limit the range of your data to interesting parts"

 

The other approach using a running mean/stdev is attached…

Best regards,
GerdW


using LV2016/2019/2021 on Win10/11+cRIO, TestStand2016/2019
0 Kudos
Message 12 of 16
(791 Views)

Okay, I will try and update you GerdW. Thanks for your help.

Add 273 on whatever Celcius said.
-Kelvin
0 Kudos
Message 13 of 16
(787 Views)

Hi N.,

 

notice the edit I made to my last post…

Best regards,
GerdW


using LV2016/2019/2021 on Win10/11+cRIO, TestStand2016/2019
0 Kudos
Message 14 of 16
(784 Views)

Yes, yes I noticed it...  If I would change the amplitude scale of the graph you plotted in the second example that is starting 0 to 0.175 to my acualt values than I was done. Now I will try to adopt the second plot to the actual amplitude values in my original graph.

Add 273 on whatever Celcius said.
-Kelvin
0 Kudos
Message 15 of 16
(778 Views)

Hi N.,

 

in the second VI you get just the peak position (X index), with this index you can read the Y values from your original data!

 

(Keep in mind the phase shift you get from the PtByPt function…)

Best regards,
GerdW


using LV2016/2019/2021 on Win10/11+cRIO, TestStand2016/2019
0 Kudos
Message 16 of 16
(777 Views)