From Friday, April 19th (11:00 PM CDT) through Saturday, April 20th (2:00 PM CDT), 2024, ni.com will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.

We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.

Feedback on NI Community

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Downconverting the VIs posted in Forums

I am not sure it is a valid ask ( and if it is then someone has suggested already )

Whenever we go to a post from a user asking for help or we post any suggestion VI which others want to see for reference number of times we get a popup saying current vis version is newer than your version.

Atleast for the VIs posted in forum can NI do someting like it will be open in our version regerdless of the version we have and the VI has been saved. Ofcourse the new function which are there in New version and not present in old versions will be shown as question mark.

We have version conversion board but i think its too much ask for VIs posted for asking help and giving help.

 

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 6
(6,078 Views)

I don't like the idea of auto conversion.  What would be nice, though, is if the LabVIEW version was listed with the attachment, much like is done with the communities.


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 6
(6,042 Views)

@crossrulz wrote:

I don't like the idea of auto conversion.  What would be nice, though, is if the LabVIEW version was listed with the attachment, much like is done with the communities.


Ever since they started playing with the semi-broken deep inspection of attachments, you would think that the VI version information could be added automatically with a little more code. 😉

0 Kudos
Message 3 of 6
(6,034 Views)

@altenbach wrote:

@crossrulz wrote:

I don't like the idea of auto conversion.  What would be nice, though, is if the LabVIEW version was listed with the attachment, much like is done with the communities.


Ever since they started playing with the semi-broken deep inspection of attachments, you would think that the VI version information could be added automatically with a little more code. 😉


At this point, I would just like to be able to post VIs.

 

EDIT: Just noticed Christian gave the same link...


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 6
(6,028 Views)

This is one of those reasons to encourage snippets!

  • version info is visible
  • vi diagram is visible (even mobile)
  • searching is improved (oh- something like that!)
  • comments in code explain points of interest
  • Can be modified under the right phase of the moon.

More snippetts please (and float a link to the CCT for usesr that use events and linked p-nodes)


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
0 Kudos
Message 5 of 6
(5,977 Views)

@JÞB wrote:

This is one of those reasons to encourage snippets!

  • version info is visible
  • vi diagram is visible (even mobile)
  • searching is improved (oh- something like that!)
  • comments in code explain points of interest
  • Can be modified under the right phase of the moon.

More snippetts please (and float a link to the CCT for usesr that use events and linked p-nodes)


 

Of course we should also menrtion the disadvantage of snippets:

 

  • connections to the connector pane are lost.
  • Front panel is not visible (typically)
  • Code in other frames of case structures, event structures, stacked sequences, diagram disable structures, etc. is not visible unless snippet is loaded into LabVIEW
  • ...

 

When I post a snippet, I typically also attach the actual VI.

 

0 Kudos
Message 6 of 6
(5,974 Views)