From Friday, April 19th (11:00 PM CDT) through Saturday, April 20th (2:00 PM CDT), 2024, ni.com will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.

We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.

Multisim and Ultiboard

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Phase angle measurement

Hi!

Is it possible to measure phase angle in Multisim? I want to measure phase angle of current through capacitor C1:

 

sema1.jpg

 

I got by hand ic1(t)=0.117*sqrt(2)*sin(2*pi*50*t-178.040deg) 

Thanks in advance.

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 11
(17,520 Views)

Solved...

0 Kudos
Message 2 of 11
(17,489 Views)

Hi,

 

Run the Single Frequency AC Analysis, set your frequency to 50Hz and set the "Complex number format" to Magnitude/Phase.

Tien P.

National Instruments
0 Kudos
Message 3 of 11
(17,488 Views)

Hi!

I did it and here are phase angles for 4 nodes in our circuit:

 

mjerenje.jpg

 

It matches with result I got by hand. However, for some reason phase of current through capacitor C1 doesn't match with my result.

Multisim measures 1.95947 degrees. Just to mention that I edited "AC analysis magnitude" of voltage source (12sqrt(2)=16.9705627 instead of default 1). Current source shouldn't be modified.

0 Kudos
Message 4 of 11
(17,478 Views)
It doesn't calculate phase angle correct. Here is complex current IC1:
IC1=-0.1174-0.0040195j. Phase angle of this current is atan(-0.0040195/(-0.1174))-pi=-3.1073rad=-178.040deg. Multisim calculates only atan(-0.0040195/(-0.1174))=1.959deg.
0 Kudos
Message 5 of 11
(17,474 Views)

Any comment? 

0 Kudos
Message 6 of 11
(17,419 Views)

This is what I got.

 

Single AC.JPG

 

Multisim file is attached.  

The value is the same however, the real part shows positive in Multisim but your calculation shows negative. I have not gone through the calculation myself.

Tien P.

National Instruments
0 Kudos
Message 7 of 11
(17,409 Views)

I got same result in Multisim as you. I will check my calculation one more time.

0 Kudos
Message 8 of 11
(17,406 Views)

Here is system of equations for this circuit (Matlab code):

 

sema12.jpg

 

R1=100;
R2=200;
R3=300;
L1=100*10^(-3);
L2=2*10^(-3);
C1=220*10^(-6);
C2=470*10^(-6);
E=12;
w=2*pi*50;
Xl1=w*L1;
Xl2=w*L2;
Xc1=1/(w*C1);
Xc2=1/(w*C2);

I=1/sqrt(2);

A=[1 1 0 0 0 0 1;-1 -1 1 0 0 0 0;0 0 0 0 1 0 -1;0 0 0 -1 -1 -1 0;-R1 -j*Xc1 0 0 0 0 0;-R1 0 -j*Xl1 0 -j*Xc2 -j*Xl2 R2;0 0 0 R3 0 -j*Xl2 0];

B=[0;0;-I;0;-E;-E;0];

currents=inv(A)*B

 

And here is result:

 

currents =

0.119418419544646 + 0.016999509142969i
-0.117492172684008 - 0.004019595549224i
0.001926246860638 + 0.012979913593745i
-0.000024074794970 + 0.001485045723510i
-0.709033028047186 - 0.012979913593745i
0.709057102842156 + 0.011494867870236i
-0.001926246860638 - 0.012979913593745i

 

I'm really wondering why it doesn't match with result from Multisim.

0 Kudos
Message 9 of 11
(17,377 Views)

Here is how I formed system of equations in my previous post:

 

sema123.jpg

 

KCL

 

Node 0: I1 I2 I7 = 0

Node 1: - I1 I2 I3 = 0

Node 2: I5 I7 = -I

Node 3: -I4 I5 I6 = 0

 

KVL

 

LOOP 1: E - R1*I1 - j*Xc1*I2 = 0

LOOP 2: E - R1*I1 - j*Xl1*I3 - j*Xl2*I6 - j*Xc2*I5 + R2*I7 = 0

LOOP 3: R3*I4 - j*Xl2*I6 = 0

0 Kudos
Message 10 of 11
(17,362 Views)