@Mathis_B wrote:
I'm joining that club. Everything was implemented but nothing worked properly. Evaluation sheet was an entertaining read: Module X does not work as specified, Module Y does not work as specified, ... (all in all 6 -7 modules).
I've even heard that people deliberately left out functionality as the architecture they chose did not make it easy to implement those bits and would have messed up their style.
If I had to retake the CLD I would go with your approach and write most of the program in stubs and fill in the blanks, much better for documentation and style.
As for the second part, I left a small bit of functionality out of my exam when I noticed I had ~30 minutes left. I spent the last half hour cleaning up my code and documenting what I had rather than messing up everything I had to maybe get that 1 more point in functionality.
Matt J | National Instruments | CLA