Certification

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

CLA VI properties not documented

I got the result for my CLA.  I didn't pass, but hopefull I will learn from it and do better next time.  One comment that I got was "VI properties not documented".  I put a requirement tag inside all VI properites at least.  Is that not enough?  I looked at the ATM CLA sample test, and I saw that many VI only has a requirement tag in their VI proerties, so I thought it is adequate.  What is the offical say on that?

------------------------------------------------------------------

Kudos and Accepted as Solution are welcome!
0 Kudos
Message 1 of 4
(6,234 Views)

Bump. 

 

I was wondering about how much VI documentation is required as well.

--------------------------------------------------

Nathan - Certified LabVIEW Developer
0 Kudos
Message 2 of 4
(5,979 Views)

I can't say officially what the rule is.  But my opinion is that you HAVE to put the requirement in there and you SHOULD also put in a quick description about what the VI should do.  Then comment the heck out of the block diagram so that any fool can figure out what they need to do.


GCentral
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
"Not that we are sufficient in ourselves to claim anything as coming from us, but our sufficiency is from God" - 2 Corinthians 3:5
0 Kudos
Message 3 of 4
(5,971 Views)

I suspect that you might have had a few vi's that need non-default vi properties like "This Dialog shall be Modal" or "This vi shall be re-enterant and inlined"

 

But that is mainly a guess- I can't see your test.


"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
0 Kudos
Message 4 of 4
(5,966 Views)