BreakPoint

[Andrey_Dmitriev]

---

Ben wrote:

...

"

 - c'mon Christian, show us the REAL solution that uses only 2 base functions!!! - you know you want to

---

You're right, but it wasn't specified overall amount used functions. My solution uses also only two base functions, but multiple times. Just created another example of "Rube Goldberg Code" 

[Hornless.Rhino]

---

SnowMule wrote:

Shouldbe easy enough to clean up with a screen thisbig.

---

Just use block diagram cleanup and hope for the best

[J.Mamakos]

This, this library makes me want to cry every time I open it!  I was given it not so long ago, accompanied by a jovial request to "simply update this to LabVIEW 8.5 and fix any bugs you find".  If you ever start to feel too relaxed, I hope this will help to reinstate your stress levels to the hights that they should normally be. 

A few pictures to tickle your taste buds:

Spoiler

---

---

---

[PiDi]

Some time ago, in some spaghetti-horror code, I've stumbled upon following chunk:

Yeah, why using new value when old one is the same?

[Hornless.Rhino]

Maybe they wanted a time delay

[Ray.R]

Saw this in code I am working on.  I'll be able to tease the author..  LOL!

top: original

bottom non-RG

[GerdW]

Hi Ray,

well, you could omit the GetDateTime function too as FormatDateTimeString already uses current time as default input...

[Ray.R]

That's true..    I RG'ed myself

[LV_Pro]

It was probably done in one of the 5 min. updates before a demo! Or  - my brain ws fried from looking at someone's "regular expressions" (why they are called "regular", sort of like "common sense", an oxymoron!)

[Ray.R]

LOL!!  Glad you like regEx   I might be able to squeeze a few more in there.

Check your PM...  I'll give you an update since last week. 

Now my turn to check for Rube...

Is the following code a Rube?  For some reason, I seem to think there is a better way to get a string of a 4 digit number...

Ah crap..  I just thought of it...  Using a regEx, of course...  I'll post the Rube code anyway..