06-21-2007 12:58 PM
@TonP wrote:
if someone can back save to 6.1 (tst?)
Yes, if things are supported there.
I'm interested in how you're planning on doing the different versions. I noticed that VIPM let's you choose between different versions of the same package, but how are you planning on doing the version numbering?
06-22-2007 01:51 AM
06-22-2007 02:22 AM
OK, I think I understand - you can control what happens with each file inside the installation depending on your LV version. That's really nice. It would have been nice if we could also define a mass compile step at the end of the installation.
BTW, there is a problem with your example (I understand it's just a quick one). File Group 1 is exclusive to 6.1 so 7.0 to 8.2 don't get the enum extracted. I assume it is possible to include both a larger than and a smaller than condition for the same files.
06-26-2007 12:53 PM
06-26-2007 01:55 PM
@TonP wrote:
Could you upload a 6.1 version?
Tomorrow, yes, but don't you want to fix it first?
I would still vote for getting rid of the timeout and the keys for cycling (unless I hear any objections).
P.S. are you planning on attempting to clean up the mess inside the VI which creates the images?
06-26-2007 02:56 PM
I have fixed it by debugging some things.
@tst wrote:Tomorrow, yes, but don't you want to fix it first?
I would still vote for getting rid of the timeout and the keys for cycling (unless I hear any objections).
P.S. are you planning on attempting to clean up the mess inside the VI which creates the images?
06-26-2007 03:51 PM
How about we move it to email?
You should have my address from Info LabVIEW.
11-08-2007 12:24 PM